RSS

Daily Archives: November 10, 2010

Rant: Blackout/All Clear by Connie Willis

Blackout (All Clear, #1)All Clear (All Clear, #2)This is less of a review than a rant, although there is a short review once I’m done griping.

Blackout and All Clear contain one story, split into two volumes.  There isn’t any real arc to each volume, there isn’t an end of one story with a cliffhanger leading into another.  At a total of  1150 or so pages, it was evidently too long to be contained in one book.

Blackout and All Clear should have been two of my favorite books this year.   I’m pretty sure that if I sat down to read them both now, they’d easily make that list.

Unfortunately, I read Blackout last April, not too long after it came out.   Connie Willis is one of my favorite authors.  I hadn’t heard much about it, and I didn’t bother tracking down any information about it, but just took it as a given that I’d read it.

Blackout is a time travel book, set in the same universe as Doomsday Book and To Say Nothing of the Dog (one of my favorite books!).    The time traveling researchers are trying to learn more about World War II.    All does not go smoothly, and they find themselves unable to return to their own time.  They must balance worries about why this has happened with those of surviving this time in history, all while trying to accomplish their original mission and find a way to return home.

I didn’t realize until about 20 pages before the end of Blackout that there was no possible way to wrap up the book before reaching the back cover.  I had no idea there was another book planned in the universe, let alone that this story was continued in it.

If I could have acquired All Clear immediately, everything would have been fine, but I had a six month wait for its publication.  My memory for names and other details isn’t all that great to start with, and in this case I had time travel and characters using multiple aliases to contend with.  My picking audio for All Clear after having read Blackout on paper probably didn’t help either.

Unfortunately, I spent the first half of All Clear trying to remember that Mary was another name for which other character? why was one character so concerned about a deadline?, and other such details that really, really mattered to following the plot.

I did figure it all out, and settled in to the second part of the book, but by then I felt that my enjoyment of the first half of All Clear had been stolen from me.  That probably isn’t fair, but it is how I felt.

Do I recommend the books?  Absolutely.  Just make sure you are prepared to read the whole thing, both volumes.  The characters are great, I love the view into the day to day life of WWII in England, the reflections on time travel (the usual concerns about altering the space time continuum) are particularly well done.  There’s drama, there’s daily life,  there’s heroic behavior there’s bits of humor.

Do I think the book needed to be that long?  I’m not sure, since I lost track of many of the plot intricacies that the length allowed.  I do know that I had been planning to recommend it to my book club.  We’ve actually read other books that were in the vicinity of 1000 pages, but we’ve been having enough trouble getting people to finish normal length books.

I’d really like to reread both, and maybe I’ll find the time at some point. Right now, I just have too many other books to read.

 
10 Comments

Posted by on November 10, 2010 in books, reviews

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Audio review and book club notes: Claude and Camille by Stephanie Cowell

Claude and CamilleClaude & Camille: A Novel of Monet

My rating: 3.5 of 5 stars

I enjoyed reading Claude and Camille, and yet found myself wishing for something a little more, or maybe a little different.

Summary via Stephanie Cowell’s website:

In his early twenties, Claude Monet came to Paris, determined to make a success in painting. He quickly found poverty, obscurity and a beautiful upper-class girl Camille who threw away a life of privilege to be with him. He also made friends with a group of likewise unknown painters, often as poor as he was: Renoir, Pissarro, Degas, Bazille, Manet and Cezanne and somehow through every obstacle in the world kept them together until they began to be known as impressionists. But the years of struggle and life in wretched rooms with little food began to wear on his patience and Camille’s endurance until even as he was beginning to sell his work, their passionate love was descending into tragedy and he was beginning to understand that he had never completely known her.

I never really connected with the character of Monet. Through the book, I got to know him as a person, but I’m not sure he was a person I would have particularly liked. He was driven by his art, and this left him feeling entitled to support from his family well into his 20s, and led him to live beyond his means at several different points in his life. I got something of a feeling for him as a painter, but not as a genius. I never saw through his eyes as an artist who changed the artistic world.

However, Claude and Camille wasn’t the story of a painter, it was the story of a relationship. With that perspective, I was much more interested in the character of Camille. I didn’t understand or agree with her decisions either, but somehow I found her more accessible, and I think I would have loved the book if it was told from her viewpoint.

Camille was a young woman so swept away by her love for her young man that she ran off with him, living with him and bearing his child in a day when women of her class just didn’t do such things. She also suffered from very dark periods, where even getting out of bed was difficult, and living the life of an artist’s wife was nearly impossible.

I loved the look into a setting that I wasn’t particularly familiar with. I also was unfamiliar with Claude Monet’s background, so I can’t speak at all to how closely the book sticks to the commonly known story.

Book Club Notes:

I read Claude & Camille for my Book Club M.  There were five of us at the meeting, and although no one disliked the book, we varied widely in how much we liked it.  There was one member that couldn’t put it down, one that was disappointed, and the rest of us were somewhere in between.

We had a really good discussion of the book, starting with what we were looking for and didn’t find.  As I mentioned above, I would have preferred Camille’s viewpoint.  The member that was the most disappointed wanted more of the painting, wanted to feel what it was like to touch the brushes and see the world. Others wanted more insight into the artistic vision of Monet and his contemporaries.

We also enjoyed talking about the motivations of the characters, and about the cost of genius (and why there always seems to be a tradeoff– there don’t seem to be well balanced, personable geniuses in life or literature).

Stephanie Cowell will e-mail you book club discussion questions, her e-mail is available on her website.  I didn’t realize this, and didn’t ask until I was on the way to our discussion, but I received them before we finished and they brought us back on topic when we started wandering on to other subjects.

Audio Notes:

Narrator: Christopher Cazenove has a very nice voice, and I had no problems with his narration.

Production: No issues with it.

Audio or print? Honestly, when I think back on this book, I’m hard pressed to remember that I listened to it– I just remember  the story.  I then wonder if there is any point to having this section of my review, if I don’t have anything to say about the audio aspects.  I decided that fact was worth pointing out.  So no, I don’t have any recommendations on audio vs. print.  Choose the delivery mechanism that works best for you.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on November 10, 2010 in Book Club, books, M, reviews

 

Tags: , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers